Seminar Project
The seminar project is designed to mimic the type of engagement and structured development that you would undertake in a SIP. The project has been scaffolded so that you execute different elements in stages in order to produce a substantial research paper by the end of the course. These assignments are all designed to build off of each other, and they can be used cumulatively, meaning that you can repurpose portions from each assignment toward another as they best serve your purposes. Please note: You will choose one course text and the entirety of the seminar project will be focused accordingly. In other words, your selected seminar text will be your primary focus for both analysis and research throughout the term across all assignments in this course.
Choose one of the following texts for your seminar project:
- George Washington Cable, The Grandissimes
- Robert Tallant, Voodoo in New Orleans
- George Washington Cable, “The Haunted House on Royal Street”
- “Bitchcraft,” AHS: Coven
- Angel Heart
- Alice Dunbar-Nelson, The Goodness of St. Rocque
- Natasha Trethewey, Bellocq’s Ophelia
- Pretty Baby
- We Won’t Bow Down
- You Can’t Stop Spirit
- Patricia Smith, Blood Dazzler
- Trouble the Water
Since this course employs a student-led and generated model, it will require advanced preparation and active individualized planning to execute. Accordingly, students will need to be proactive throughout the term and construct a research schedule that will ensure successful progress. With this in mind, I suggest the following timeline, which will designate both required and recommended deadlines.
Week Two Thursday (Required): Deadline to select seminar text (a google doc sign-up roster will be provided via email and on Moodle. We will confirm final selections in class on Thursday of 2nd week).
Week Three Thursday (Required): Sign up for your Weeks 4-7 Respondent/Discussion Leader text (Reminder: You must sign up for a text and thematic unit that differs from your seminar text)
Weeks Three-Five (Recommended): Find/Skim 2-3 outside sources for your Annotated Bibliography each week.
Week Three Friday (Required): Read/Skim or view as much of your seminar text as possible. This approach enables students to begin research for the annotated bibliography due week 5. This timeline also ensures that students interested in applying for the New Orleans Cluster Seminar will have an operational understanding of their text and research interests by the week 4 Monday deadline.
Week Seven Thursday (Required): Sign up for your Weeks 8-10 Respondent/Discussion Leader text (Reminder: You must sign up for a text and thematic unit that differs from your seminar text)
Weeks One-Ten (Recommended): Read/Consider two maps per week from Solnit and Snedeker, Unfathomable City: A New Orleans Atlas to assist your thinking about the “placeness” of New Orleans. Reflect on approaches to and conceptualizations of space, plus modes of mapping utilized, as pre-work for your mapping project.
Weeks One-Ten (Recommended): Keep a New Orleans Location Journal (a google doc or word doc is fine) where you log references to specific locations in NOLA mentioned in your seminar text and in your research. Keeping track of these references, with page numbers and content relevance, will be a invaluable resource when you start working on your mapping project.
Analytical Presentation (15%)
DUE: In accordance with the allotted day for your chosen seminar text
There are two components to this assignment: 1) the analytical presentation and 2) the workshop discussion that follows. Each presentation will be approximately 40-45 minutes in length. You will be graded on the strength of your analysis, the clarity of your delivery, and the questions and feedback you offer during workshop discussions throughout the quarter. You will receive a written evaluation from me within a week of your presentation; in it, I will assess your analytical argument and presentation, as well as give you suggestions for how to develop your work further.
The in-class presentation: In advanced seminars (and at professional conferences in our field), the typical format for presentations is the delivery of a 10-20 minute talk, during which you read an analytical interpretation of the assigned text/s. For our purposes, we will approach this presentation like a works-in-progress workshop, wherein you present a short paper (approximately 5-7 pages), then announce questions (usually 3 questions will guarantee enough material with which to work) that develop and build from the core ideas in your analysis. These questions are largely grounded in ideas you’re still working through: are there moments in your analysis that you’re struggling to resolve? Are there elements within your primary text that you can’t reconcile given your approach? Are there crucial moments in the text (a film sequence, a passage from a novel, a concept from a piece of criticism) that you haven’t incorporated yet and want to discuss further? Are there important themes or ideas that you feel connect to your analysis and you want to brainstorm ways to make those conversant with the work you’re already doing in your analysis? In the discussion that follows your presentation, your respondents and I, with help from your other classmates, will help you work through the questions you have posed. This is your time to collaborate with knowledgeable peers about the material and your argument, with an eye toward the next steps in the development of your analysis for the research paper.
The content of your analysis can pull from other texts: a comparison with another piece of literature, the use of an assigned critical essay, the use of outside critical or historical research, the application of theory, etc. Or, you can simply offer an extended analysis of your primary text. What you’re presenting is simply where you are at that moment in the process.
The workshop discussion: The questions you pose about your work will be the foundation upon which we build a class. The objective is to raise specific concerns that we can address together. To that end, please submit your paper and your core questions in advance of your presentation so that your respondents and I can better prepare to address your concerns. Please send a Google Docs link of your paper to our course alias (engl490-1@kzoo.edu) by 9pm EST the day prior to your presentation. This platform will allow for greater ease with sharing, enable your peers to comment directly on the paper itself, and give me the ability to track and credit your peers’ feedback.
Discussion Leader/Respondent Role (10%)
To help lessen anxiety about the need to read all of the texts for this course thoroughly, each student will serve as a Discussion Leader/Presentation Respondent twice during the term (first in Weeks 4-7 and again in Weeks 8-10), both times with 2-3 other classmates, though you need not work/prepare together in advance. In this capacity, you will be expected to read (and/or view) all of that day’s course material with great care and thoroughness, to the extent that you’d feel comfortable doing a presentation about the assigned texts. In effect, you will serve as our designated “experts” for our discussion and will also undertake the following: 1) read the Analytical Presentation/s in advance of class, 2) offer both in-class and written feedback to the presenter/s on Google Docs, and 3) help lead and sustain discussion of the course material after the presentation/s.
Your Discussion Leader/Presentation Respondent days cannot be the same as your Analytical Presentation; nor should they be on the same topic or text.
Respondent Feedback Expectations: Please read through the Analytical Presentation paper/s, in advance of that day’s class, with the writer’s concerns and questions in mind. You can elect to offer written feedback at that time, or wait until after the presentation and discussion. This feedback can be as straightforward as “I really like this portion of your analysis because your argument was really clear and purposeful” or “I think this point needs to be developed more” with suggestions about what needs clarifying and/or ways the writer can do so. Your feedback should be added no later than Friday by 11:59pm EST via track changes in the Google Doc.
Annotated Bibliography (10%)
DUE: In-Progress Annotated Bibliography, Sunday, 10/17 by 11:59pm EST, with final version submitted with the Research Paper
Research scholarly criticism on the primary text/s in your presentation
- Annotate 10 sources (peer-reviewed journal articles or books on your selected text and/or subject; acceptable variations: theory/criticism, historical, cultural, etc.)
- Use at least five of these sources in your research paper (due Wednesday, 11/23 by noon EST)
- Submit the final, revised draft of your annotated bibliography with your research paper
- Each annotation should be approximately ¾- 1 full page in length and should present the following scope: 1) full MLA citation of source 2) a brief summation of the source itself, which would include the author’s main argument and methodology or theoretical intervention. You will resubmit this annotated bibliography with your final research paper, in which your annotations will be expanded to include one additional component: 3) an explanation of how this source is useful, i.e., how you’re engaging the source and/or how the source helps you to advance your specific analytical argument.
Critical Dialogue and Analysis (15%)
DUE: Saturday, 11/5 by 11:59pm EST
This assignment is designed with the following objectives in mind: 1) to help you hone the way you frame criticism within your analysis 2) to guide you in how to posit your entry into a critical dialogue within a field of existing scholarship and 3) to practice this kind of critical intervention prior to the submission of your research paper.
Write a 3-4 page paper on your chosen course text that places two critical essays about that text (or subject matter) in dialogue with one another. After establishing a critical dialogue, you will use that foundation as framework to inform your analysis. There are many ways to conceptualize this work, but ultimately it requires that you solidly introduce the overarching argument within your respective critical essays, synthesize the way in which their interventions overlap or work in contestation with one another, and use this synthesis to triangulate your analysis accordingly.
The strongest approach will consider these developmental steps:
- The way your respective critics highlight a particular theme that has been a primary focal point for this course (history, invention or construction, territorialization, race, language, gender, sexuality, etc.)
- An exploration of the dialogue that emerges within the overlap in how your selected critics consider that theme in relation to your chosen text
- Your original analysis of that theme in your chosen text
- A consideration of how this analytical foundation informs a greater understanding of the use of NOLA as an experienced or imagined space
Here’s a suggested structure that might help you execute the assignment in an effective manner:
- Standard introduction that situates your analysis of your chosen text. In this case, your critical essays are secondary rather than primary sources, so they do not need to included. If you have already done your Analytical Presentation, it is absolutely fine to copy/paste from that existing document
- A summary/overview or explication of Critical Essay 1 (approximately 1/2 page; feel free to borrow exact language from your Annotated Bibliography)
- A summary/overview or explication of Critical Essay 2 (approximately 1/2 page; feel free to borrow exact language from your Annotated Bibliography)
- Critical dialogue synthesis, wherein you establish the conversation between these critical ideas or arguments (1-2 pages)
- A summative paragraph that announces your analytical intervention and application to your course text (this will function as your conclusion)
Research Paper (20%)
Due Wednesday, 11/23 by noon EST
Build off the approach you used in the Analytical Presentation and/or Critical Dialogue and Analysis assignment to write a 12-20 page paper based on the research you undertook on your selected presentation text/s. Of utmost importance is to center and to advance your analytical argument, but to do so while framing the critical dialogue of scholars within the field. This expertise can encompass periodization (e.g., American Realism and Local Color Fiction as particular fields of study); textual (what analyses preeminent scholars have advanced about The Grandissimes); authorial (what analyses preeminent scholars have advanced about George Washington Cable and his literary canon); theoretical (how structural or post-structural theory influences an analysis of the word “Creole” and how it is being “manipulated” within the novel); historical (The Louisiana Purchase and U.S. territorialization within New Orleans); cultural (social practices—like the masquerade balls—of the Creole elite.)
Papers should be formatted according to MLA: one-inch margins, 12-point font, Times New Roman, last name and page number in header at top right, parenthetical in-text citations, a Works Cited page, and Annotated Bibliography.
Mapping Project and Presentation (20%)
A Literary Guide to New Orleans entry due: Monday 11/21 by 5pm EST
Alternative Map and Mapping Project Presentation: Tuesday, 11/23 during our final exam period, 8:30-11am (or alternate day/time arranged in advance by class vote)
There are two mapping components to this assignment. The first will be an entry into our course’s A Literary Guide to New Orleans site.* This entry should be approximately 4 pages in length and will blend the analysis in your research paper alongside an analysis of your text’s locational significance within New Orleans. We will be using Google Maps, or some other type of GPS-dependent program to affix your entry to a particular point on a digitized map of NOLA. This location can be a particular site (the Lalaurie House), a street (one of the streets on the Mardi Gras route), a neighborhood (The French Quarter), etc. Ideally, your coverage of the text’s locational significance will contextualize the specific history embedded at the site, as well as its contemporary use and/or relevance. Of particular importance is to ensure that your textual analysis and research work cooperatively with the site location analysis. In other words, your textual analysis and research should inform the way you read and understand it as a site during your text’s time period and within contemporary New Orleans.
*Information on host site and uploading instructions TBA
The second mapping entry will use Rebecca Solnit and Rebecca Snedeker’s Unfathomable City: A New Orleans Atlas as a model for an alternative map—in both form and concept—of your literary site. Use the following excerpt from their introduction as guidance for formal concerns:
Most people don’t use paper maps anymore. Instead, they use digital data devices—their smartphones, GPS devices that issue voice commands, or various versions of MapQuest and Google maps that generate specific directions. The problem with these technologies is that though they generally help get you where you’re going, that’s all they do. With a paper map, you take charge; with these other means, you take orders and don’t learn your way around, any more than you learn math by using a calculator. A map shows countless routes; a computer-generated itinerary shows one. Using the navigational aids, you remain dependent, and your trajectory requires obedience to the technology—some GPS devices literally dictate voice commands you are meant to obey. When you navigate with a paper map, tracing your own route rather than having it issued as a line, a list, or a set of commands, you incrementally learn the lay of the land. The map becomes obsolete as you become oriented. The map is then no longer on paper in front of you but inside you; many maps are, as you contain knowledge of many kinds of history and community in one place. You no longer need help navigating but can offer it. You become a map, and atlas, a guide, a person who has absorbed maps, or who needs no map intermediaries because you know the place and the many ways to here from there.
(4-5, emphasis added)
Using your knowledge of this site as the grounding for your design, create a map that conceptualizes and represents the simultaneity of history, community, culture, systems of territorializing power, etc. embedded in this location. Your medium, materials, scale, and means of representation are part of the process of encoding and revealing the place.
During our scheduled final exam time, you will present both of these maps. (Everyone in class will have your mapping entry for A Literary Guide to New Orleans in advance of your presentation.) This presentation should be approximately 10 minutes and needs to detail the anchoring locational foundation for each map individually. After you establish a point of comparison in terms of content and approach, your presentation should emphasize the interplay of meaning established between these site maps.